Solutions for Success

Is there anybody home?

I will preface this blog by letting you know I am not, nor claim to be an admissions expert. I do like think I know a little bit about sales though, especially phone sales. 

Phones are the lifeline of my business.  If a potential candidate or client can’t reach us, we are loosing money, quickly.  I think the same holds true for admissions, another craft that relies heavily on phones.

When my recruiters are calling into schools to identify and source potential candidates I can’t tell you how many campuses have no one answering the phones.  I understand this is the technological age and have no problem dealing with an auto-attendant.  The real shock comes when I “press 1 for admissions” and then get a voicemail at 10:30AM in the morning!!!   What if I was a student inquiry?  Don’t most schools spend thousands on admissions training, lead generation, hi-tech tracking software, and complex phone systems?  Then why would they not have someone answer the phone?  Or at least have it forwarded to a third party call center that can gather the relevant information and pass it on to the admissions team to follow up on.

There is an old saying in sales when the phone rings: “there is money on the line.” Campuses work so hard to attract potential students.  It seems such a waste to have that hard work pay off, only for the student to find out, no one is home….

Vincent Scaramuzzo is the President of Ed-Exec, Inc. One of the leading executive search firms in education. He has consistently been ranked in the top 2% of all recruiters worldwide by Management Recruiter’s International, the world’s largest executive search firm.  Vincent is also a contributing author to Career College Central’s magazine and web site.  As a specialist in the education field, Scaramuzzo works nationally with Universities, Colleges, Online and Career Schools.  He can be contacted at vincent@ed-exec.com  860-781-7641.

 

Well it’s a New Year, and for Admissions it should be a real barn burner!

We are a business that always seems to do well when the rest of the world is feeling like it’s swimming upstream. It’s always been that way – you know the famous Countercyclical thing and all. So what should admissions do with all those new leads that think getting a career that isn’t going to be lost in the shuffle do?

Sell the opportunity for someone to understand that having more than one thing going for themselves isn’t such a bad thing. Sometime admissions feels they have to replace a bad experience with a course of instruction. That’s their  solution. “Sorry about what’s happening, now become a medical assistant and everything will be ok – let’s go to financial aid and see if you qualify”.

Not a really good approach unless your retention numbers are too high and you need more attrition at your school.

This is a time to slow down the train and listen, evaluate, discuss, and then offer a suggestion.

Maybe school is the answer, more times than not, it will help. But the way to sell it isn’t as a replacement to something, but as a supplement to something. No one wants to think that what they already spent time and energy getting to know has no more value. But everyone understands being multi-skilled. For example.

Suppose you already went to school to become an administrative assistant, and you were working at that job when one day HR came and in said to you “sorry”. What do you do? Well of course you go look for another AA job, but what if over the past 6 weeks a whole bunch of other qualified AA’s lost their job too, and right now there is a surplus for people looking and not enough jobs to go around, what then?

Unemployment check – well maybe, but that won’t pay too many bills. Go live back at home – of course, that’s always an option, that’s what parents live for (sure!). Another alternative, watch TV and then what happens, “ Call XYZ College today and real soon you will be on your way to a new exciting career, etc, etc, etc.”

So, in they go, fill out the whatever, go to admissions, and well you know the rest.

But my money is one not selling them a new career, my money is on selling them an option and an ace in the hole if they ever need it. Having something to fall back on, you know, just in case. I wouldn’t want to replace the current career choice, maybe she loves it and has always wanted to be an AA. I would suggest that we discuss possible alternatives that would allow her to be employed even during the tougher times, like now. I would spend the time to get to know what she has an interest in and then offer some suggestions, not to wave good-bye to her AA experiences, but to do to earn a good living while she was waiting for things to maybe get better and then she could, if she even wanted to, go back to what she loves, being an AA.

I would talk about the allied health arena, the IT arena, and anything else my school may offer that has reasonable career potential as demonstrated by its placement history.

But the one thing I would not do is ask her to replace what she already knows and loves with something else as a permanent move, but just to get another option while she has the time. And of course I would tell her that in many ways she will be able to offer a new employer not only the skill-set she just learned, but in addition, all the skills she already knows from her previous employment. And chances are, being multi-skilled will maybe put her on the shorter “A” list for that position she may be interviewing for.

It’s easier for someone to accept change and expense if it’s looked at as a “additional” as opposed to “replaceable” . The mental gymnastics are less cumbersome as the value of the time and money spent learning the first one wasn’t a waste of time. If someone thinks they are creating additional value without losing the initial value, it’s a much easier proposition to sell.

More on Low Hanging Fruit

The idea that there’s quick results from “low hanging fruit” has been very intriguing lately. The theory is that abundance in terms of new students, program offerings, student services, and more is so easily attainable. You just have to look for the low hanging fruit. No need to get a fancy cherry picker because you don’t need to go to the top of the tree for results.  Low hanging fruit has no risk attached to it, is ripe or ready, and provides a solution instantly.  Think about increasing enrollment for example. Where are potential leads that are likely to enroll? Referrals come to mind. Are you using referral methods or if no, why not?  What other solutions are you looking for that are really all around you if you watch for them and are in ready mode to harvest right now?

What are your thoughts?

Remember the rules of admissions, part II

Finding the person.

Run the ads, get the referrals, do the interview. A group interview would be my preference. Select those that have potential, bring them back for a second interview. Bring them back for a third interview. Then schedule them to take a profile - online, offline, really doesn't matter. But get to the core of their personality and tolerance, and to the core of their ability to communicate. Get to know their inner confidence, their weak points, their major strengths - all the things that make them the real person they are. Are they a sales person, a promoter, a con, a lost soul with a good story?

Then start to think about hiring them. Because even after that, you should evaluate how they will fit in, how they will help the team and how they will see the interview opportunity as their cue to drive enrollments and starts.

CDL's are getting more expensive. Internet conversions for ground schools are getting tougher. PDL referrals are slowing down. All of that may or may not be a factor at your specific school, so if I am wrong, that's not the point. This is: It is getting very competitive out there, and you need the best people on the front line.

If you can't pay them a lot, then train and select them the right way from the get-go. After all the dust settles, your classes are only full on the backs of your admissions people. It's a simple theory to validate, by the way, for those who are non-believers.

To properly test:

  1. Get rid of the entire admissions team and their support
  2. Check the start roster on the next start date - yikes!
  3. Move all the financial aid people to admissions
  4. Check the next start roster on the next start date
  5. Move the teachers and deans into admissions
  6. Check the roster on the next start date
  7. Move the Director/President into the admissions department
  8. Check the start roster on the next start date
  9. Cue the crickets

The selection process is more important than the training one.

Remember the rules of admissions

They narrow down to some pretty simple concepts:

  1. People won't make contacts for products they have no interest in;
  2. People will go to your school, if you make it make sense;
  3. People generally buy things from people they like;
  4. You need shoppers to have buyers; and
  5. Education still sells, but the value has to be greater than the cost.

So, we have a person who probably has interest, who can go to school, if they like the person they are speaking with, if the whole thing makes sense, and they are "just looking around." Okay. But they have no real idea of value as it pertains to your school, or the ones down the street. So how will they choose?

And the dance begins.

Admissions people have a strong tendency to say more than they need to - at the wrong time, and sometimes for all the wrong reasons. I think it has something to do with the fact that when they interview someone for school, they tend to handle it the same way they think someone should handle them. They use some of your ideas and your materials, but end up using more of what they think is right.

Even when monitored, they slip a bit. Imagine when you are not monitoring. Have a mystery shopper shop them and nail them to a cross. Well, it's not much of a motivator when you think about it.

So as a result, they tend to wrap their interview around themselves - a critical error. They can memorize and use PowerPoints all day long, but in the end, they have their opinions, you have yours and I have mine. All are swell.

However, the only one that really matters in the interview is the one from the person looking for information. And if we communicate on a level that they like, understand, has obvious value, is interesting, has a point, doesn't ramble and doesn't seem wrong, then we have a chance.

Unfortunately, that isn't always the case. Our admissions representatives present material, without passion generally, to a person who needs passion to make the commitment. It really isn't any easier at ITT, Strayer, Everest, Art Institute, or Bubba's Auto Body School. It is still an inquiry looking for some guidance, direction, empathy, and incubation. They want something they can see themselves doing, and this is not the same as something the admissions advisor sees them doing.

My advice is to spend the time hiring the right person to represent your program and institution.

Having an award-winning training program and spending tons of dollars in material and facilitators on someone who can't/won't/doesn't want to do the job still results in the same missed opportunity. It always reminds me of the story about the dog food sales convention:

The annual Apex Dog Food convention was being held in Los Angeles. Everyone was there, all the big shots, the regionals, the representatives and all the guests. Tom, the Vice President of Sales, got up on the stage, and in his usual flair, asked the audience, "Who makes the best dog food in the world?"

They all chimed in, "We Do!"

Then he yelled, "Who has the best packaging in the industry?"

Again they all yelled, "We Do!"

Then he yelled again, "Who has the most healthy ingredients in their dog food?"

Again, "We DO!"

Then his last question, "Then why aren't we selling more of this great dog food?"

In the back of the room a sales guy yelled back, "BECAUSE THE DOGS DON'T LIKE IT!"

In our world, hiring the wrong person who "doesn't like it" results in the same missed opportunities. Being an admissions representative is something you have to love in order to do. You can't make admissions "just a job." You can't PowerPoint passion. No one really feels a PowerPoint presentation. They feel people and their enthusiasm about what they are talking about.

If selling services were that easy, everyone would own a projector or laptop. Presentations from representatives need to be from the heart, eye to eye, along with using collateral material and PowerPoint. All are good, but won't work unless the person using them has a passion for admissions. And by the way, most people don't really have a clue what admissions is as it applies to our industry, so the selection becomes even more of a challenge.

In my next entry (which is really a continuation of this one) I'll talk about finding the right person for the job.